Knowing what you really want is very crucial in identifying the better kitchen appliance for you. Blending and juicing are the two most efficient ways to get nutrients and vitamins without having to cook the fruits or veggies. However, the blender vs. No one correct answer has been reached that suits everyone. Your better option greatly depends on your nutrition and digestion needs and preferences.
But if you can afford to have both in your home, go for it and enjoy all the benefits of both. All the best! Half of her working hours are spent on mixing ingredients for her recipes.
The other half involve working with the tech team to research and test the tools and appliances that promise to make kitchen work effortless and mess-free. From a kitchen knife or water filter to the Instant Pot, if it can help save time and effort for the home cook, Luna and her team are on it.
Home Blenders. We may receive commissions from purchases made via our links at no additional costs to you. And I don't know about you, but when I find a little chunk of banana or strawberry in my smoothie, my heart sings.
Third, the concept of food costs comes to mind. Juice requires more produce than you might expect. Think about how much sugar and what small level of fullness you are getting for the price when you invest in juice.
When paying for produce, it makes financial sense to use as much of that produce as you can. Another item to note: juicers themselves can be expensive. Many cost hundreds of dollars. Blenders can too, but there are a lot more models available that won't compromise performance for a lower price tag.
Speaking of pricey, juicers are expensive in time. They are extremely difficult and time-consuming to clean. The sticky leftovers get harder to clean the longer you let them sit. A lot of confusion has arisen about the different nutritional aspects of juicing vs blending. Similarly, the multimillion commercial venture known as the Nutribullet blender has built its reputation by going after the juicer market, claiming that it is a 'nutrient extractor'.
If you've seen the hype for this on the shopping channels or websites you could be forgiven for agreeing with us that this cheap chinese blender seems to be sold primarily on the basis of 'nutribullshit'. The argument that a blended drink is better than extracted juice largely rests on the claim that you waste a lot of goodness when you are juicing by discarding pulp, whereas you include everything in the drink when blending.
This is only half true because with an efficient juicer you are mainly wasting the fibre element of the ingredients. If you already get enough fibre in your diet generally, what is the big advantage to adding more in the form of blended vegetable drinks? To understand this point more fully we need to look at what is potentially misleading in the claims made by Vitamix.
A good quality juice extractor does exactly the opposite to what Vitamix say here. They are selling blenders by trying to introduce a fear of the risk of disease if you use a juicer. These claims are made in bold headings in literature that they've produced and they are completely unsupportable. If I juice a bunch of grapes there is a tiny proportion of waste, consisting mostly of grape skins.
With fibrous vegetables there is more waste, because there is more fibre. The waste from a good juice extractor consists mainly of this indigestible plant fibre and the majority of the nutritional content available is already extracted in the juice, so juicing is not as wasteful as claims by some blender manufacturers disingenuously suggest.
As juicers separate the fibre-containing pulp and seeds from the fruit or veg, you're left with a clearer liquid — and a pulp you have to discard or compost. In contrast, high-performance blenders will process the whole fruit — skin, seeds and all, where relevant — along with all the fibre that comes along with it.
So, no waste. Of course, this is only useful for fruits and veg where you actually want to eat the skin, such as apples and pears. Cheaper or smaller blenders may not be as effective at blending fibrous fruit or veg. Fiona says: "Some smaller personal blenders struggle to create a truly 'smooth' green smoothie. From cleansing your body of toxins to promises of ultimate nutrient extraction, juicers and blenders pitch themselves as the perfect New Year get-healthy resolution. But which is better for you, a juicer or a blender?
They are both a convenient way to get more fruit and vegetables into your diet, and could motivate you to experiment more with new ingredient combos and embrace better alternatives to sugary soft-drinks or unhealthy breakfasts. However, there are a few nutrition factors to be mindful of. Juices are not as nutritionally beneficial as smoothies made in a blender or just eating a piece of fruit, as they strip most of the fibre and can encourage you to consume too many calories if you exceed recommended daily servings.
Juices are not as nutritionally beneficial as smoothies made in a blender or just eating a piece of fruit. Government website, Eat for Health, says: "Many of us drink far too much fruit juice.
0コメント